Challenges
- NOAA imposed unlawful financial burdens on fishermen, causing significant economic harm.
- The case was not just a legal battle but also a fight against a long-standing administrative doctrine (Chevron).
- Ensuring the Supreme Court would take up the case required not only legal advocacy but also a compelling public narrative.
- Breaking into a crowded media space with a story that started as a regulatory issue affecting a niche community (fishermen).
Overview
For over three decades, NOAA held authority to require observers on commercial fishing boats. When the agency ran out of funds to monitor the Atlantic herring fisheries, it shifted the financial burden to fishermen without congressional authorization. Several fishermen, represented by our client, petitioned the Supreme Court to intervene, challenging both the overreach and the broader Chevron doctrine, which had allowed administrative expansion unchecked by judicial oversight. Touchdown Strategies was retained to drive awareness of this case, targeting Supreme Court influencers to secure the Court’s attention.
Touchdown Strategies was retained to drive awareness of this case, targeting Supreme Court influencers to secure the Court’s attention.